Graphic Notes: The Night Before
An Invitation to Stewardship
In the process of our ongoing exploration of the unique contribution of
the World Café and the World Café Community Foundation during these
times of challenge and transformation, several things are becoming
clearer to us. Perhaps most importantly, we've reaffirmed our deep and
enduring commitment to ensuring that the core ideas, principles, and
process of the World Café remain freely available to all.
In
recommitting to the "open source" approach and grass-roots perspective
that has led the World Café into the vibrant, dynamic global force that
it is today, we are also reaffirming our faith in the global community
of World Café friends and practitioners to serve as stewards for its
ongoing development and evolution in increasingly diverse, creative,
and powerful ways.
One expression of this is our recent
decision to stop singling out specific individuals as "regional
stewards" on the website. Instead, we encourage all friends and
practitioners to think of themselves as active stewards of the World
Café.
We invite each of you who cares about the World Café to
step forward to help nurture the areas and activities you feel
passionately about — to serve as an "attractor" and resource for
others who may want to join in hosting conversations that matter.
For
some, this may be holding World Café events in your town or city,
hosting conversations about the questions that matter most locally. It
may mean mentoring new World Café hosts, telling people you meet about
the transformative power of conversation, or actively sharing
innovative practices in the online community forum.
For many,
it will mean supporting the the World Café Community Foundation by
"tithing" 10% or more when you are earning money from the World Café
(as a growing number of practitioners are starting to do), as well as
sharing your stories so others can learn from them, and perhaps most
importantly, it means listening to the spirit of the World Café and
working in ways true to her (we're pretty sure it's a "her")
principles.
Stepping up to World Café stewardship will look different to different people. What might stewardship mean to you?
We're
very excited about this change, and in the next month or two will be
moving to a new online community platform that will give us a better
way to steward this network together. We'll share more about the new
platform in the next month or two, but rest assured it will be much
simpler to use and have the features we need to stay in touch and grow
together.
Our World Café: Kitchen Table Conversations for Change
This story is reprinted from the You Learn Something New Every Day blog, thanks to Gillian Martin Mehers from The World Conservation Union in Gland, Switzerland:
This morning our Director General invited the headquarters staff for a World Café on our institution’s Organizational Development and Change process. Fifty-four of us met in the cafeteria to participate in the process. Here are some of our “hot” reflections on the event.
World Café is an innovative way to think collectively about an issue, with conversation as the core process. In our case, 12 conversations happened in parallel, and after each of the four rounds we took some highlights from these conversations. With interesting, rather iterative questions, you could feel the energy build as people made connections and meaning for themselves and others. Here are the questions we used:
•What is your vision of a highly relevant, efficient, effective and impactful IUCN?
•What underlying assumptions have you had about how we, in IUCN, work? How might these need to shift?
•What can we do to help identify and embrace opportunities for IUCN’s organizational development?
•What patterns are emerging from the three earlier conversations? What are the implications for you and for us?
The results of the discussions will feed into our organizational development and change process, through the people in the room, their teams and our individual action. Additionally the process itself will help us move towards some of our articulated goals around creating a culture of dialogue, interaction, and an enabling environment for innovation and cross-pollination of ideas.
Since we (the Learning and Leadership Unit) are the ‘process people’, we captured some of our learning about holding a World Café in our institution. Here is what we thought went well, and what we would do differently next time. We are also sharing our learning with the World Café online community at the request of David Isaacs, one of the authors of The World Café book. (More knowledge resources on The World Café can be found on the Society for Organizational Learning‘s website here.) [note: there are free hosting guides and other resources available on the World Cafe website]
What worked well with our World Café:
• The process brought lots of positive energy to a conversation about change;
• People appreciated being listened to;
• Mixed groups combined different teams and levels within the organization and gave opportunities to get to know new people (when we asked the group if this process had given them a chance to speak to someone they did not know, almost every hand went up);
• It was hosted by the Director General and connected to a real internal process where people had questions and a desire to contribute;
• It linked with an in-house tradition – Wednesday morning sponsored coffee – a weekly coffee morning for staff supported by our Learning and Leadership unit and the Human Resources Management Group to promote internal dialogue and informal learning;
• We held the World Café in our cafeteria, so instead of trying to transform a formal space (like a meeting room) for informal conversation, we went right to the organization’s kitchen literally for these conversations, which changed the interpersonal dynamic. There was kitchen noise and the sound of coffee machines making it all the more real;
• We did not use a flipchart to take down the “popcorn” ideas between each round. We wanted to avoid to externalising the ideas and actions too much and directing the focus away from the group. Instead the comments came from within the group, were given to the group (and not a flipchart), and stayed with the group. We did, however, record them all for future use, which we will share with participants, among other ways through the use of a wordle (take a look at this application that creates beautiful word clouds, if you have never seen one)
• We distributed an “ideas form” to give everyone the opportunity to share some of their top ideas with us afterward. We handed this out just before the end and also sent an email for people who wanted to send us some ideas electronically. People did a great personal prioritization for us and themselves, and the act of writing it down also helped people to go through the synthesis process and create a set of potential next actions that might help them remember what was most useful for them.
• We put flipchart-sized graph paper on all the tables as grafitti sheets. People used them for recording ideas. Added benefits: the gridded paper (instead of plain) made it seem more like a checkered table cloth, and the white paper reflected on people’s faces making the photos better!
What we would do differently next time:
• In a room not made for speeches (i.e. a cafeteria), acoustics can create challenges for facilitating and hearing ideas from the tables between rounds. To address this we used a soft whistle to get people’s attention and asked people to stand up when sharing their ideas. Next time we would get a louder whistle (!) and we would contract lightly with the group in advance to quickly conclude their conversations when they hear the whistle.
• In our briefing, we would emphasize further that the host is responsible for ensuring interactive conversations, but not necessarily for recording or reporting back. At the beginning, making this clear would have helped our host volunteers come forward more quickly.
• Whilst the vast majority of participants stayed throughout, a few people trickled in and out due to other commitments, which was fine. We might have created better messaging to ensure a crisp start.
Only a few people had participated in a World Café before, out of our 54 participants; now that people know how it works the next time we might not notice this.
We got some terrific ideas and comments out of our World Café, including many thanks for running such a process internally. People seemed to be happy to take this kitchen table approach to connect and make new meaning together around our organization’s future. And this open process provided plenty of opportunity for everyone’s ideas and concerns to be laid on the table – besides the kitchen sink – which was nearby anyway.
Interview with Nancy Margulies
World Cafe host (and so much more) Nancy Margulies, interviewed by Nicole Anne Boyer:
NAB: When and how did you first become involved in TWC?
NM: About the time Juanita and David were figuring this out, they came out to Sundance where Margaret Wheatly was doing a workshop. I was up there working with her, doing workshops on chaos, complexity, and self-organization. She had just written her foundational book Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World.
When I heard Juanita describe the World Café as a process and a way of understanding the power of conversation, I immediately said “I want to work with you and support you in any way I can” because we had been talking about this “other way of being together”, of being part of a healthy living system, but didn’t have a a specific way to practice it— it was all theoretical. To me Open Space and the World Café were good examples of what Margaret’s theory suggests.
Juanita and I put a poster together, and I started to illustrate and host cafés myself and developed my own variations, like the “Passion Cafes” – think of Open Space meeting TWC where people define their topics and the café tables are organized around those topics. And then the Climate Change café started. I also used TWC in New Orleans to help the recovery process, and then to help people around the country consider what we can learn from what occurred in New Orleans.
I have a set-up in my home that allows me to host cafés as well, which I use for dialogues within my community. So I just got involved. I was sick when Juanita was writing the book, so I feel bad that I didn’t help there, but I just wasn’t available. When I started feeling better, I just got back into it again.
NAB: What does stewardship mean for you personally?
NM: It means I care for the whole of the World Café community. I keep an eye on the notion of how we’re doing on the largest scale — how it’s going out in the world. My particular area of stewardship, what I’m concerned about and interested in, is what I call the “Runaway Café”. That’s where people see the World Café once and want to host it, but don’t learn and understand the elements needed for a World Café. For instance, they assign a leader to each table, or the have a specific outcome they know in advance. This is a situation where you have people at tables, but it’s not a World Café. The real value is in the guiding principles, and its important that these principles not be lost. So as a steward, I keep an eye out for that. I make myself available. I mentor and coach in setting up World Cafés all the time. About once a week I field an inquiry, send some artwork, or help with what questions to ask, and remind them of the elements that make it a world café versus a table conversation.
NAB: Why are you a steward?
NM: The World Cafe like an offering, a gift to the world, to help us take the next step in our evolution as human beings. We have the possibility to listen to each other and know that we have the wisdom we need to think together, to become a system that knows that it knows. Instead of homo sapiens, we can become homo sapiens sapiens. In other words, we are capable of collective intelligence, we can draw from a shared morphogenic field, and we need know and experience that we can do this. Even [inherent] in casual conversation is the way we create the future— it frames what’s possible, it motivates us to take action. How we spend our trivial time really matters. For instance, if we spend our time talking about how much we hate our president, to use a recent example, we are creating that kind of negative energy. On company coffee breaks, instead of complaining, we could say, “ hey, we are the company, we can explore what the company can become.”
NAB: What are some of your favorite stories of the World Café in the field?
NM: When I was hosting a café at a University last semester, during the break I was talking to the professor. She told me students were complaining to the teaching assistant, so it was clear they were at the rebellion stage. So we used the last round of the café to talk about this. I explained: “we’re going to apply the Café process directly… we’re going to look at this very class and your experience of it.” The questions I asked were: What’s working? What would you like to see happen? And how can you contribute to making it happen? Well, this changed everything. This reminded them of what they liked, and there was a lot they did appreciate, and what they wanted to add or change was discussed in the context in how they could make it happen. This was a wonderful turnaround.
Another time in New Orleans, we did a Café to give people a chance to tell their stories and feel heard. Then we asked them to create a “map of hope”. We first asked them, “Create a symbol that represents New Orleans for you.” Then we asked them: “Write down some of the things you are seeing now that give you hope. Talk to people at the table, and as you listen, add things to your map of hope that give you hope. As you go around to other tables, keep building your map. At the end I suggested they each Look at their maps, highlight one action that can be taken next.” Everyone left in a very different mindset than when they arrived.
My daughter and I hosted a café in a small colleague town. The students and the people who lived in the town didn’t get along at all. So our Café focused on how to live together in collaboration. The results were amazing with so many creative ideas. The art students, for instance, agreed to go to the main street and decorate all of the shops with boarded up windows and put in art installations. The business students then helped the local merchants get more business back on Main Street, and creating businesses tailored to students so they didn’t drive to the next big city. It was a great example of how the Café enabled people to discover ways to help each other out.
NAB: What are your current passions and interests? What are you particularly excited about now?
NM: Are you familiar with The Natural Step?
Well, I’m working with Terry Gips, who lives in Minneapolis. Building off the Natural Step, which arrived in North America in the early 1990s, Terry has been going around the country teaching this concept and improving it – making it more compelling and the science more accessible.
So we’re developing a curriculum for all age groups and all segments within various communities and at the national level. We may do this with Obama’s “Green Team” and a huge publisher, so we’re partnering for
the largest possibilities. The way Terry teaches is extremely clear and very valuable, and I can make it fun with visuals like animation and clear graphics. The workshops may be followed by Climate Change
Cafés like I’ve been hosting, and there may be a blog forum as part a larger sustainability initiative. For instance, after Terry does a workshop, we can encourage people to host cafés, and discover what it
means to their community.
I have a proposal in for Obama to go on TV once a month and pose a question for national conversation and dialogue for people to talk about in their communities, the results of which he would reflect back
to the nation. We’ve got a web address already, www.conversations4change.com, which would showcase TWC and other methodologies to help people host their own conversations. We’d then expand the conversation to the international level.
The first questions are unifying questions. They are about our common values and dreams. None of them would be about handling little details, but more about helping us figure out what we all want for our
children and the future. These would be Appreciative Inquiry types of questions.
In order to do this work with Terry Gips, I’ve been learning to do simple and fast animation, combining existing and new techniques. Animations like this are little advertisements for an idea, which are
effective and interesting, because they are passed around on YouTube. This is like coming full circle for me because I used to do animation in the 1960s, but that involved painting on acetate. So learning these
new technologies has been quite the learning curve.
NAB: What inspired you to get back into animation?
NM: The Story of Stuff really inspired me, if you’re familiar with this. It was so viral and amazing. Also Playing for Change particularly inspired me, which shows different musicians around the world playing the same song, “Stand by Me”. That just blew my mind.
Look what’s possible— on the iPhone you can download an application called Ocarina which plays like a flute. You see on the phone the holes in the shape of a flute and you simply blow into the phone’s mic
to make music. And it gets even better. You can look at the iPhone and select a screen that shows a picture of the globe where people are also playing flutes, and you can hear them play— like Kiko from Japan.
It’s a very powerful visual, the knowing that we’re all playing songs, and that these songs are coming from the same earth. There is a Native American expression that when you are singing, and you stop singing,
someone somewhere else starts singing at that exact moment—so the song never stops and that we have this continuity, through artistic expression.
There is also a photo essay on line of young people in a small tribe near Ethiopia, who like to dress up. They use natural dyes and local plants and flowers to make the most sophisticated and gorgeous things,
something beyond what you’d see in Vogue Magazine. Just seeing all of these faces of African teenagers, being able to see them in their creativity, I’m really stunned by that. We’re able to capture interesting things like this.
Another short example of something I did on www.spotofgrace.com. I just drew while my daughter videotaped me, and I listened an audiotape of my friend, Dawna Markova, telling a story— a very low-tech sort of thing, but we can now use these tools.
I’m very committed to sustainability and social justice, and so I don’t want to be flying all over the country with a giant carbon footprint. I’m looking for local projects that don’t require me to get on planes. My goal is to fly half as much as the year before. The new technologies make it possible to be connected to other people in the world. People can see what I’m drawing and participate. So we have all of technologies things converging.
I’m also working with Gifford Pinchot at the Bainbridge Graduate Institute, where I teach a course. He’s asked me to coauthor a book with him called the Happiness Damage Ratio. This is a way to stop and
think, before we do something, about how much pleasure we’ll get or be sacrificing, or what the impact will be on the earth in terms of damage or restoration. It will be a short an easy book on how to make these
kinds of decisions. Part of this is redefining the good life.
Finally, I’m teaching once a semester at The Presidio School of Management as well. We’re doing a Café this Thursday in fact.
NAB: What does success look like for TWC, for you, in the future— say 5-10 years from now, what’s your dream for TWC? How can we bring TWC to its greatest potential?
NM: Success would be that the World Café is built into the culture as a natural part of who we are with each other. Where Obama will have introduced and opened a space for generative dialogue and appreciative inquiry, which becomes as common as a church social – on Sundays for instance there might be World Cafés. Where we see that this is a way for our culture to get together, to think together, with children and parents and faculty — the whole system — using this to gather and share ideas, as a way of learning from one another. In the future, this won’t be unusual. You won’t meet someone and have to tell them what a World Café is. And the principles will become more obvious— that the wisdom is within us, that conversation is part of how we create shared meaning.
Success would be that lots of people have the capacity to host Cafés. People will have been taught this in schools, and in business schools it would be at a more sophisticated level so that people who are developing leadership skills understand that leadership is about enabling other people to develop strong relationships, share information and learn from each other.
I imagine little electric vans available for “Café To Go”, where place an order and the van comes with all the supplies you need, and helps you set up the Café. There would be also a Café “On the Road”, where couples get into alternative energy vehicles and travel around the country, hosting cafes on different topics, and sharing with people what they heard form the last community they visited, creating a network of learning with people feeding good ideas into a central area. This would be all networked via the Internet so that you won’t feel that it was just one, individual conversation, but that the larger network was in communication with itself.
There would be also physical, “Brick & Mortar” Cafés. For instance, there might be a regular café at a restaurant, or Sunday Brunch, with the topics announced in advance. My daughter did something like this in St. Louis where she hosted cafés often for women on topics of special interest to them.
NAB: Wow! What an amazing vision to end on! Thanks very much for your time and stewardship.
Youth Dialogue Project World Cafés
Rockrose Institute’s Youth Dialogue Project World Cafés for the 2008 National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation Conference in Austin
by Mariah Howard and Deborah Goldblatt
The team: etsuko kubo, Abigail Joseph, Deborah Goldblatt, Alissa Gentille, Jonna Justiniano, Mitch Findley, Milton Reynolds, Ken Homer, Nick Challed, Mariah Howard
How do you get ten people, ranging in ages from 21 to 58, to collaborate and design three sessions for a national conference on the topic of inter-generational relationship and live to write about it? Mariah Howard and I, Deborah Goldblatt, both team members of Rockrose Institute’s Youth Dialogue Project for NCDD’s 2008 bi-annual conference have collaborated on this story with the intention of sharing some of the lessons and challenges that emerged during our Cafés – and hope those lessons will aid others doing inter-generational work.







